>It's been theorized that these companies are trying to reinstate an "official" narrative for people to follow. You can theorize anything. Doesn't mean it's tr

>It's been theorized that these companies are trying to reinstate an "official" narrative for people to follow. You can theorize anything. Doesn't mean it's true. Tim Pool is not the best resource on this either. His default is to provide the most nefarious interpretation of facts on hand ... and in this case he doesn't have evidence for this 'theory'. The problem is that if Google doesn't use major sources then they get accused of propagating 'Fake News' - because non-major news sources tend to be more sloppy and more overtly biased in their reporting. Do you want Breitbart or Infowars to be a news result for political news queries alongside NYTimes and Washington Post?