2 ms·
The US would rather have no collateral damage at all. Hence the expensive high precision weapons and all that. If you are suggesting that the US should not kill
by m0zg 8y ago
The US would rather have no collateral damage at all. Hence the expensive high precision weapons and all that. If you are suggesting that the US should not kill terrorists, that's not a realistic proposition.
- gmueckl 8y agoHm... why do you believe that not killing these people is not an option? Do you have first hand experience with them? I don't. All I have to go on are news stories and occasional annecdotes from people in the affected areas. That does not make a very complete picture. How successful would these people be without any intervention by the US?
- m0zg 8y agoNo I don't. Some people objectively deserve to die. See e.g. ISIS, radical islamists, etc.