4 ms·

Its very sad when what used to be the most prestigious paper in the world is pushing corporate propaganda with the new Red Scare. Citing deranged conspiracy th

Its very sad when what used to be the most prestigious paper in the world is pushing corporate propaganda with the new Red Scare. Citing deranged conspiracy theorist Molly McKew as some sort of an authority on anything brings just more disrepute to The Times.

tzs 7y ago
Dude...the second paragraph of the article is a link to RT's YouTube channel where RT posted a video making the bogus claims that the Times is reporting. There are other links within the article to other RT reports making more such bogus claims. I don't see how you can claim it is corporate propaganda to claim that Russia is doing something and back that claim with cites directly to sources funded by the Russian government making the claims that the article claims they claim. I've also done some Googling and can find no backing for your claim that Molly McKew is a deranged conspiracy theorist. Furthermore, she is only one of numerous people cited. You make it sound like the brief mention of her in the article is somehow crucial to the entire article.
- StanislavPetrov 7y ago
  Who says those claims are bogus? Why would you take the Times claims at face value, but not RTs? Intelligent people don't take any claims at face value. Mollow McKew is a career neocon and registered foreign lobbyist for the former Soviet country of Georgia. The NYT also cited in this article employees of New Knowledge. New Knowledge is the company that create fake bots to influence the Albamma election. The scheme involved New Knowledge creating bots that appeared to be Russian and then spreading fake stories in US corporate media that the Russians were attempting to influence the Alabama election. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jones-russia.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jon... These are the sources that the NYT uses to "debunk" claims about 5G? A conspiracy theorist who is a registered foreign lobbyist and a fraud who tried to influence an election using fake Red Scare tactics? What's even worse, at the bottom of this bit of corporate propaganda using the Red Scare to squash questions about 5G, the NYT admits: “In January, The Times announced a joint venture with Verizon to build a 5G journalism lab.”
smt88 7y ago
Based on your username and the Russian astroturfing I've seen on this site many times, I would struggle to believe you're a neutral observer.
- StanislavPetrov 7y ago
  Clearly your life is filled with struggles. Without the great StanislavPetrov none of us would be here today, which is why I chose this moniker.

tzs 7y ago

Dude...the second paragraph of the article is a link to RT's YouTube channel where RT posted a video making the bogus claims that the Times is reporting. There are other links within the article to other RT reports making more such bogus claims. I don't see how you can claim it is corporate propaganda to claim that Russia is doing something and back that claim with cites directly to sources funded by the Russian government making the claims that the article claims they claim. I've also done some Googling and can find no backing for your claim that Molly McKew is a deranged conspiracy theorist. Furthermore, she is only one of numerous people cited. You make it sound like the brief mention of her in the article is somehow crucial to the entire article.

StanislavPetrov 7y ago
Who says those claims are bogus? Why would you take the Times claims at face value, but not RTs? Intelligent people don't take any claims at face value. Mollow McKew is a career neocon and registered foreign lobbyist for the former Soviet country of Georgia. The NYT also cited in this article employees of New Knowledge. New Knowledge is the company that create fake bots to influence the Albamma election. The scheme involved New Knowledge creating bots that appeared to be Russian and then spreading fake stories in US corporate media that the Russians were attempting to influence the Alabama election. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jones-russia.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jon... These are the sources that the NYT uses to "debunk" claims about 5G? A conspiracy theorist who is a registered foreign lobbyist and a fraud who tried to influence an election using fake Red Scare tactics? What's even worse, at the bottom of this bit of corporate propaganda using the Red Scare to squash questions about 5G, the NYT admits: “In January, The Times announced a joint venture with Verizon to build a 5G journalism lab.”

smt88 7y ago

Based on your username and the Russian astroturfing I've seen on this site many times, I would struggle to believe you're a neutral observer.

StanislavPetrov 7y ago
Clearly your life is filled with struggles. Without the great StanislavPetrov none of us would be here today, which is why I chose this moniker.