3 ms·
This probably has a large amount of 'survivorship bias' embedded in it (no pun intended). People who are frantic, time-critical, but not immediate life-threate
by _red 7y ago
This probably has a large amount of 'survivorship bias' embedded in it (no pun intended).
People who are frantic, time-critical, but not immediate life-threatening situations probably grab their bag (ie. the landing gear on plane has failed, but plane has stopped on runway intact and not on fire).
This probably differs significantly if the plane was ripped in half, or people were choking from thick toxic smoke. Those people probably don't even think about grabbing their bag because they are in active severe pain / dying.
Point is, people are making a rational decision that "This is a dangerous situation and I need to get out of here, but I will probably survive", therefore they take their stuff with them.
- dorfsmay 7y agoI'm not sure humans are very rational while in a panic. You hear a lot of stories of people being in life threatening situations and make irrational decisions, and the ones who survived saying they cannot explain why, but this one stupid thing they focused on was somehow extremely important to them at the time.
- tyingq 7y agoSimilarly, I find it odd in those "real life crime" TV shows when cops comment on how someone's affect and demeanor "aren't right" following a murder.