5 ms·
Oh my I'm sure glad you can't pass such a dictatorial law [1]. By directly charging people for using a safety mechanism that they bought with their car, you are
by marstomorrow 7y ago
Oh my I'm sure glad you can't pass such a dictatorial law [1]. By directly charging people for using a safety mechanism that they bought with their car, you are incentivizing people to reduce the physical safety of others around them.
You really want that average American, with less than $400 in savings, to think twice about honking and potentially saving someone's life by warning them of danger? It's not even about actually saving $5, it's about the length of time it takes to think about it. Even if you decide not to save the $5 and go for it, honk! you may have delayed so long that someone is now dead that could have been saved.
> If you really need to honk, you'll happily pay $5 for the ability.
This is very definitely not true and an incredible danger to society. Please reconsider the unintended consequences of charging poor people to maintain other people's physical safety on the roads and sidewalks.
[1] And I think this is a wonderful example of why all dictatorships are bad, especially those run by people who think they know all the solutions already.
- toss1 7y agoThe point is to make them think twice about the DISTINCTION between honking to save somebody's life and honking to express their own annoyance or frustration. (I think the idea of tying the could level inside the car to outside is better, but that you are missing the point)