4 ms·
That's definitely fair, and warrented. We haven't really had the resources for (relatively) long to put into performance when we were still in early stages. How
by emilycook 7y ago
That's definitely fair, and warrented. We haven't really had the resources for (relatively) long to put into performance when we were still in early stages. However we've constantly been improving that, to the point where I truly doubt you'd find that we suffer disproportionately from performance issues more than any competitor.
Before I worked here, I was on a team that evaluated different devops tools, and I felt the same apprehension about the uptime. But we eventually chose gitlab, and the only real downtime we experienced was during the 2017 outage. And we liked having the option to switch to self-hosted if it became too much of an issue
- nerdwaller 7y agoThere’s a pretty vocal group that favors GitLab, I campaigned for it internally at a few companies as well - having so much of the tooling in once place is pretty nice. It’s obvious that GitLab is making quick improvements consistently. The project boards are better than most others, the CI is phenomenal, and I have noticed the review process is being worked on. Keep up the good work, we need options in the space!