> No shareholder has said that Which is... rather the point? Nobody would ever say that, so nobody should reasonably expect a larger compensation than the aggr

> No shareholder has said that Which is... rather the point? Nobody would ever say that, so nobody should reasonably expect a larger compensation than the aggrieved families either. I already get a migraine whenever I hear of monetary compensation for the loss of a human life, but this time it's just that much more twisted. Quoting myself here: > If you insist on putting a monetary value on human life, at least make sure you got your numbers in order. The answer to whether we should put a price tag on a human life is: We should not, but we have to. So let's at least get it right.