"Naive falsificationism" shows up in Internet comments from the kind of people who think vaccines cause autism or global warming is a hoax, and cling to a singl

"Naive falsificationism" shows up in Internet comments from the kind of people who think vaccines cause autism or global warming is a hoax, and cling to a single isolated result as "proof". Even on the Internet they aren't a majority. If the author merely wants to argue against that kind of thinking, that's fine, but given the extensive discussion of Karl Popper and physicists, I don't think that's the author's intent.