> And yes, this topic is something of an exception. Is it, though? The top comments include ad hominem attacks on Google engineers, such as the replies to: htt

> And yes, this topic is something of an exception. Is it, though? The top comments include ad hominem attacks on Google engineers, such as the replies to: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19886610 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19886610 I appreciate how you responded to the worst attack, at least, but the general viciousness is still disappointing. I don't work for Google, but I'm sure not eager to present a contrary view if I'm just going to be mislabeled a shill. Doubly so for anyone who does work at Google, I imagine. Possibly developers from other members of the AMP Project's governing committees as well, including Cloudflare, Twitter, and Microsoft: https://blog.amp.dev/2018/11/30/amp-projects-new-governance-model-now-in-effect/ https://blog.amp.dev/2018/11/30/amp-projects-new-governance-... I don't want criticism of AMP censored, but I don't think AMP should be an exception to the rule against negativity either.