3 ms·
First half of the article felt more likely to be a modern risk due to earbuds. Actual ambient noise pollution might be a problem, but I doubt it. I don’t see ho
by b_tterc_p 7y ago
First half of the article felt more likely to be a modern risk due to earbuds. Actual ambient noise pollution might be a problem, but I doubt it. I don’t see how such studies could adequately control for air pollution. On a related note, this quote from the article didn’t make any sense to me:
> ‘If you could eliminate all motor-vehicle noise or all motor-vehicle air pollution—but not both—which would you choose?’ As a rule, the majority chose noise.”
- atomical 7y agoNoise is the obvious answer if the respondents are in a city with a low AQI number. It can be hard to breathe in large cities in India and China.
- FrozenVoid 7y agoIt makes perfect sense, people can't see pollution - they hear noise.