> There is no future for JVM in concurrency at this point. Even a toy VM/language designed for concurrency will be able to beat it. I disagree. Java's concurr

> There is no future for JVM in concurrency at this point. Even a toy VM/language designed for concurrency will be able to beat it. I disagree. Java's concurrency features are extremely rich. Parallel stream are basically magic: I add .parallel() and pow, near-linear speedups. No channels, no select statements, no realising I messed up a mutex somewhere. It just works. Then there's reactive programming. The JVM can chew through truly absurd amounts of requests when a reactive approach is taken.