3 ms·
> your suggestion that it should be named the same as Go is a bit ridiculous. Are you aware that you're making that complaint in a discussion on Libmill: Go-St
by geezerjay 7y ago
> your suggestion that it should be named the same as Go is a bit ridiculous.
Are you aware that you're making that complaint in a discussion on Libmill: Go-Style Concurrency in C?
It's one thing to skip the submission to jump to the comment section. It's an entirely different thing to start mindlessly criticizing constructive criticism presented by fellow users while being entirely oblivious to both the subject and the context. That's just noise, and contributes zero to the discussion. In fact, it takes an awful lot from it.
- fao_ 7y ago> Are you aware that you're making that complaint in a discussion on Libmill: Go-Style Concurrency in C? Just because it's Go-style, doesn't mean "Exactly like Go, down to the keywords used".
- geezerjay 7y ago> Just because it's Go-style, doesn't mean "Exactly like Go, down to the keywords used". That point was already discussed previously in the discussion, and it's pointless to continue repeating what has already been said, particularly when those arguments boil down to nothing more than a personal opinion.
- fao_ 7y agoI read the entire discussion and didn't see a single person mention it, but ok.