4 ms·
I agree that nothing is inherently loss. This is more like a rediscovery. Still, the covering of that painting, which had artistic merit on its own, is now a t
by Hoasi 7y ago
I agree that nothing is inherently loss. This is more like a rediscovery. Still, the covering of that painting, which had artistic merit on its own, is now a thing of the past. I am curious what Vermeer would have thought of it.
- acqq 7y ago> I am curious what Vermeer would have thought of it. I can tell you I'd hate that somebody overpaints with nothing a part of the picture that I've spent so much energy to paint exactly with what I wanted. I see no excuse for that.
- Hoasi 7y agoThank you for your opinion, it might be different from the painter's though. But ultimately, we don't know.