3 ms·
I would say, let Google develops the tech and figures out where are the blocking points, and then it could eventually become a standard and be implemented by ot
by antpls 7y ago
I would say, let Google develops the tech and figures out where are the blocking points, and then it could eventually become a standard and be implemented by other actors.
About making the technology reliable and secure, I do trust Google more than my bank.
- user9023 7y agoBanks are the worst but they are in the game for centuries and there are thousands of laws and jurisprudence for banks. And mark my words, laws will be too little, too late. We need to stop the "move fast and break things" now, we should put ethics side by side with "because we can" otherwise people will suffer the.consequences
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- antpls 7y ago> We need to stop the "move fast and break things" now, I understand your concerns, but I believe we should upgrade the Democratic system to give people more direct and more often opportunities to change the law rather than slow down technology progression
- sieabahlpark 7y agoThe reason we live in the economy and government today with such successful companies and people is because you can't change the law on a whim. The predictable rate of change of laws is actually by design. It doesn't let a single government change everything.