4 ms·
It is unfortunate that the libui author very much insists on doing everything himself instead of encouraging a more community oriented development approach. The
by rapsey 8y ago
It is unfortunate that the libui author very much insists on doing everything himself instead of encouraging a more community oriented development approach. The job is too big for any single person.
If that project was managed better it would be huge. Even by basically being unusable it still has so much interest.
- 52-6F-62 8y agoI look back into that library and it’s derivatives every other month hoping. It’s intuitive to use as is, though I haven’t honestly look at the design. It could be great.
- pault 8y agoWait, what's stopping the community from helping out? It is open source, right?
- rapsey 8y agoWell if PR don’t get merged because the author plans on redoing that part of the lib or does not fit with their “vission” that pretty effectively kills the community help.
- vortico 8y agoI can completely relate. Some contribution is good when a project has established a few regular contributers, but a lot of open-source maintenance these days is babysitting drive-by programmers. In my experience, people's code can be so bad, it would take 2x the time to fix than to implement myself with nothing but a brief feature request from them instead.
- zem 8y agoisn't JUCE single-developer too? it's been around forever and seems pretty featureful
- richrichardsson 8y agoStarted off as such (Jules Utility something something), but now there is a team of at least 3 or 4 working on it.