> As far as the “human rights” organizations go they have little legitimacy considering how most of them operate and their selection bias > Hamas is classified

> As far as the “human rights” organizations go they have little legitimacy considering how most of them operate and their selection bias > Hamas is classified as an enemy of the state by Israel as far as targets go this is a legitimate target. Surely your opinion is more legitimate and weighs more than their's right? Your bias is barely showing, especially when proudly declaring that war crimes, atrocities, and human rights violations are irrelevant or justified because "they be the enemy". It's the kind of explanation you'd imagine was used in the Nuremberg trials by those who also considered anything done to "the enemy" was justified and legitimate. I hope you'll excuse me, I'll have to make my exit here before you plumb new depths of abjection. I have made my point pretty clearly: considering what happens in that war, claiming that a hit was the natural response to hacking is both a needless excuse and a load of BS (given that no other non-Palestinian hacking attempt triggers this reaction).