4 ms·

Who exactly are you arguing against here, who says that Linux always works? Your Samsung example is instructive here. One-off hardware that was never intended

Who exactly are you arguing against here, who says that Linux always works? Your Samsung example is instructive here. One-off hardware that was never intended to run under Linux, never did and still doesn't. While you have had some frustrating experiences, the broad consensus, and my own experience, say that Linux tends to extend the useful life of older hardware. For instance, I have a cheap asus notebook from the Windows 8 era. Windows 8 is EOL, so I upgraded it to Windows 10. Windows 10 takes literally half an hour to boot in the best case, which is after spending a whole day in the update-reboot loop, making sure the system is fully updated. (I do this every quarter or so.) So I dual boot Arch. Arch boots in 30 seconds. And that's not to mention the stack of Thinkpads going back to 2002, all of which still work flawlessly. (But of course they work, because if Linux ever had a target laptop platform, it was 2000s era Thinkpads.)

acqq 7y ago
> who says that Linux always works? The whole context of this thread is me responding to the answers to my initial claim (still hard to read, so let me repeat): > One should always be able to sign one's bootloader. If it's only 6.5 years later it can be that not even Linux support for that hardware would exist then? And your response finally, the way I see it, confirms exactly that: if you have some notebook for which Linux can't be normally developed and maintained, after 6.5 years the Linux won't "magically work." Which is what I claimed from the start. Full 6.5 years after the introduction, it can remain a non-target. Not as a notebook, but as a set of hardware parts which aren't openly supported. Like all non-Dells and non-Thinkpads for years were, as you also confirm. Being able to install VMs before 6.5 years are over is also not enough.

acqq 7y ago

> who says that Linux always works? The whole context of this thread is me responding to the answers to my initial claim (still hard to read, so let me repeat): > One should always be able to sign one's bootloader. If it's only 6.5 years later it can be that not even Linux support for that hardware would exist then? And your response finally, the way I see it, confirms exactly that: if you have some notebook for which Linux can't be normally developed and maintained, after 6.5 years the Linux won't "magically work." Which is what I claimed from the start. Full 6.5 years after the introduction, it can remain a non-target. Not as a notebook, but as a set of hardware parts which aren't openly supported. Like all non-Dells and non-Thinkpads for years were, as you also confirm. Being able to install VMs before 6.5 years are over is also not enough.