This seems a little bit like saying that companies should be held to similar standards as governments ought to be, with regards to “the rule of law”, and the wh

This seems a little bit like saying that companies should be held to similar standards as governments ought to be, with regards to “the rule of law”, and the whole “the law should be publicly stated, and laws shouldn’t apply retroactively” thing. Which is, a claim worth considering? I am not convinced yet. I suppose that the fact that PayPal is a money transfer service, which is necessary for many kinds of businesses, and maybe kind of a monopoly, that could be a reason to treat them as more like a government than some businesses should be treated? Hm.