3 ms·

> You can simply save the file and expect it to work everywhere I don't quite follow. This is because the gif is decoded and played. No different than a video.

> You can simply save the file and expect it to work everywhere I don't quite follow. This is because the gif is decoded and played. No different than a video. You don't need a proprietary player to loop a video, you just go back to the start of the video. For streaming, this is only problematic for large videos that can't be cached, but the same applies to large gifs. Browsers can loop video, it's just a right-click setting. HTML5 can loop video, allowing sites to serve video in e.g. a banner, replacing gifs. You can save any video file just like a gif. > Something that browsers treat as a moving image and not a video. The entire point of deprecating gifs is because video is superior. Gif as an image format being able to specify frame duration and looping is hardly a noteworthy feature.

echelon 7y ago
Video isn't superior for sharable, loopable images. Try downloading a video from a popular social network. Can you easily do it without inspecting the source? If it's a two second clip, does it loop on your system? Or does the video player exit / end the stream? This is absolutely a problem that GIF doesn't have. > You don't need a proprietary player to loop a video > You can save any video file just like a gif. Except social networks force you to use a locked down or DRM'd player. You can get chunks of the video sometimes. Your non-tech friends are out of luck. > you just go back to the start of the video "just". Yeah, how many players support that out of the box? Yours might, but there are many more that do not.
- clouddrover 7y ago
  > Can you easily do it without inspecting the source? Yes, I use Page Info (Tools menu -> Page Info) in Firefox. It lists all the media assets on the page and you can download the one you want. The inability to right-click and save a video is less a problem with the video file itself and more a problem with how the page is structured. You can have the same right-click problem with GIFs depending on where they appear in the page structure.
  - saagarjha 7y ago
    You can't do this on mobile, though…
  - asutekku 7y ago
    ... That’s far from what I would call an acceptable ux.
    - clouddrover 7y ago
      So make an add-on which does the same thing with whatever UX you want. It's a good project for you. I look forward to using it when you're finished. Alternatively, use one of the media downloading add-ons which already exist.
      - asutekku 7y ago
        Mass adoption doesn’t want to use addons or go in to the developer tools. That’s my point. I know how to do it but even for me it is not intuitive.
        clouddrover 7y ago
        Your point doesn't address the fact that you can have the same right-click problems with GIFs as with video files. The file type doesn't matter, the page structure does. The great mass of people don't care about saving media assets from a page. There will never be mass adoption of this, no matter how easy it is.
        asutekku 7y ago
        They do though. For example love to share memes to each other and with phone it’s as simple as pressing the image for a long time. Video formats do need the same kind of actions to compete with the ease of use of gifs.
        clouddrover 7y ago
- harshreality 7y ago
  Your complaints about true video formats (vp8/vp9/x264/x265/av1 with html5 video) replacing true gifs are misplaced. Inability to save videos/gifs isn't a format problem, it's a problem due to javascript obfuscation or DASH/HLS making it difficult because you have to find the video chunk url(s), fetch them, and if there are multiple pieces, piece the full video back together. Campaigning for a return to gif isn't going to make those sites switch back. The only sites that might switch back would be sites that already allow right-click download. They won't switch back either, though, because gifs are vastly less efficient. Looping is a html5 video tag attribute. If a video isn't looping, it's because the site serving the video didn't add that tag attribute. Many gif-style video upload sites automatically loop videos. Also, gifs in browsers don't support seeking which is annoying for gifs more than a few seconds long. HTML5 video is perfectly fine, loops fine, and is easy to save if the site doesn't obfuscate it with javascript or turn it into a chunked HLS or DASH mess.
  - kkarakk 7y ago
    so you're saying the solution to use as a replacement is harder to use and clunkier? right, i'm sure everyone will rush to adopt it and customers won't care at all
- aw3c2 7y ago
  > Try downloading a video from a popular social network. That's the site's decision. You also cannot easily download images from Twitter if there are more than one in a tweet for example. On Instagram it is blocked all in all.
  - the8472 7y ago
    > That's the site's decision. No it isn't. UA means user agent, not corporate agent. If the user decides to persist something that is loaded on his machine then it is his choice to make.
    - aw3c2 7y ago
      You were lost some where in the thread above. I totally agree but that's not what we were discussing here.

echelon 7y ago

Video isn't superior for sharable, loopable images. Try downloading a video from a popular social network. Can you easily do it without inspecting the source? If it's a two second clip, does it loop on your system? Or does the video player exit / end the stream? This is absolutely a problem that GIF doesn't have. > You don't need a proprietary player to loop a video > You can save any video file just like a gif. Except social networks force you to use a locked down or DRM'd player. You can get chunks of the video sometimes. Your non-tech friends are out of luck. > you just go back to the start of the video "just". Yeah, how many players support that out of the box? Yours might, but there are many more that do not.

clouddrover 7y ago
> Can you easily do it without inspecting the source? Yes, I use Page Info (Tools menu -> Page Info) in Firefox. It lists all the media assets on the page and you can download the one you want. The inability to right-click and save a video is less a problem with the video file itself and more a problem with how the page is structured. You can have the same right-click problem with GIFs depending on where they appear in the page structure.
- saagarjha 7y ago
  You can't do this on mobile, though…
- asutekku 7y ago
  ... That’s far from what I would call an acceptable ux.
  - clouddrover 7y ago
    So make an add-on which does the same thing with whatever UX you want. It's a good project for you. I look forward to using it when you're finished. Alternatively, use one of the media downloading add-ons which already exist.
    - asutekku 7y ago
      Mass adoption doesn’t want to use addons or go in to the developer tools. That’s my point. I know how to do it but even for me it is not intuitive.
      - clouddrover 7y ago
        Your point doesn't address the fact that you can have the same right-click problems with GIFs as with video files. The file type doesn't matter, the page structure does. The great mass of people don't care about saving media assets from a page. There will never be mass adoption of this, no matter how easy it is.
        asutekku 7y ago
        They do though. For example love to share memes to each other and with phone it’s as simple as pressing the image for a long time. Video formats do need the same kind of actions to compete with the ease of use of gifs.
        clouddrover 7y ago
harshreality 7y ago
Your complaints about true video formats (vp8/vp9/x264/x265/av1 with html5 video) replacing true gifs are misplaced. Inability to save videos/gifs isn't a format problem, it's a problem due to javascript obfuscation or DASH/HLS making it difficult because you have to find the video chunk url(s), fetch them, and if there are multiple pieces, piece the full video back together. Campaigning for a return to gif isn't going to make those sites switch back. The only sites that might switch back would be sites that already allow right-click download. They won't switch back either, though, because gifs are vastly less efficient. Looping is a html5 video tag attribute. If a video isn't looping, it's because the site serving the video didn't add that tag attribute. Many gif-style video upload sites automatically loop videos. Also, gifs in browsers don't support seeking which is annoying for gifs more than a few seconds long. HTML5 video is perfectly fine, loops fine, and is easy to save if the site doesn't obfuscate it with javascript or turn it into a chunked HLS or DASH mess.
- kkarakk 7y ago
  so you're saying the solution to use as a replacement is harder to use and clunkier? right, i'm sure everyone will rush to adopt it and customers won't care at all
aw3c2 7y ago
> Try downloading a video from a popular social network. That's the site's decision. You also cannot easily download images from Twitter if there are more than one in a tweet for example. On Instagram it is blocked all in all.
- the8472 7y ago
  > That's the site's decision. No it isn't. UA means user agent, not corporate agent. If the user decides to persist something that is loaded on his machine then it is his choice to make.
  - aw3c2 7y ago
    You were lost some where in the thread above. I totally agree but that's not what we were discussing here.