> Distributing something that was not a study as a study was what upset people last time. People got upset because an add-on for a commercial TV series auto-ma

> Distributing something that was not a study as a study was what upset people last time. People got upset because an add-on for a commercial TV series auto-magically installed itself in their browser without their manual intervention. You can't just abstract that out into an ethics framework of, "If Firefox sends non-X over a channel reserved for X, then users get upset." I mean, you can, but you're going to be rightly confused and misunderstood.