I think Anonymous want to force third parties to oppose the rule of law to government's “suggestions” — no political overthrow per se, but trying to force a jud

I think Anonymous want to force third parties to oppose the rule of law to government's “suggestions” — no political overthrow per se, but trying to force a judge to stand to the precedent of NYTimes vs. USA on Pentagon papers. “Victory” here would be to have some press (done — if a coverage worthy of Olympic games is satisfying) and a stable URL (done), or better: the 1st link on Google search and an active Facebook page where they can safely link to articles about Nobel prize, Obama's hypocrisy and PayPal reversal (done, done and done).