3 ms·
That seems like cold comfort to me. If that was their concern, they could easily keep Roe v. Wade while making it effectively useless. For example, they could a
by actuallyalys 7y ago
That seems like cold comfort to me. If that was their concern, they could easily keep Roe v. Wade while making it effectively useless. For example, they could argue it only prevents explicit bans and that banning it after six weeks is okay. Such a ruling would strike down this particular law, but it would leave plenty of room for more indirect ways of banning abortion.