4 ms·
Circles exist in nature. You can deny it, but it isn't true. Now go with your atomic imperfections and external influences and take a nap, because it must be e
by elvecinodeabajo 7y ago
Circles exist in nature. You can deny it, but it isn't true.
Now go with your atomic imperfections and external influences and take a nap, because it must be exhausting to be so repellent.
- n4r9 7y agoI'm sorry for being dismissive but you threw a barrage of contentious examples at me without really trying to engage with my point. The way I see it, the circle is an abstract idea which resides within the language that we use to share our understanding about the patterns we observe in the external world. Those patterns may conform to the abstraction to varying degrees but they are fundamentally not the same thing. Mathematics is a very precise and formal way to communicate this type of knowledge, but that doesn't mean the ideas therein exist objectively. This contrasts with the views of someone like Max Tegmark, who has the impression that the universe is inherently mathematical.