5 ms·
Huh, that's strange Firefox nightly here is slower than Crankshaft: http://krakenbenchmark.mozilla.org/kraken-1.0/results.html?%7B%22v%22:%20%22kraken-1.0%22,%
by BonsaiDen 16y ago
Huh, that's strange Firefox nightly here is slower than Crankshaft:
http://krakenbenchmark.mozilla.org/kraken-1.0/results.html?%7B%22v%22:%20%22kraken-1.0%22,%20%22ai-astar%22:%5B2070,2281,2123,2528,2183,2254,2335,2437,2256,2314%5D,%22audio-beat-detection%22:%5B2418,2411,2402,2397,2398,2379,2423,2398,4003,2444%5D,%22audio-dft%22:%5B1000,990,1000,1025,1006,1023,1090,1010,1056,1035%5D,%22audio-fft%22:%5B1891,1848,1821,1853,1827,1820,1853,1820,1900,1847%5D,%22audio-oscillator%22:%5B1027,1044,1033,1053,1052,1050,1028,1046,1063,1030%5D,%22imaging-gaussian-blur%22:%5B1242,1265,1271,1268,1268,1244,1266,1246,1284,1300%5D,%22imaging-darkroom%22:%5B622,631,620,635,631,619,621,636,666,629%5D,%22imaging-desaturate%22:%5B1276,1285,1284,1311,1324,1311,1267,1277,1274,1318%5D,%22json-parse-financial%22:%5B403,401,409,415,409,410,402,409,415,402%5D,%22json-stringify-tinderbox%22:%5B146,146,145,145,147,147,147,147,156,147%5D,%22stanford-crypto-aes%22:%5B464,467,448,460,460,451,458,529,471,472%5D,%22stanford-crypto-ccm%22:%5B759,752,758,758,743,749,752,371,354,341%5D,%22stanford-crypto-pbkdf2%22:%5B679,686,691,686,688,688,679,1052,730,679%5D,%22stanford-crypto-sha256-iterative%22:%5B311,308,311,309,304,311,303,324,313,308%5D%7D http://krakenbenchmark.mozilla.org/kraken-1.0/results.html?%...
- thristian 16y agoI did mention my Chrome test was without Crankshaft - I'm using x86_64, and Crankshaft isn't available for that platform yet. Doing the comparison thing, apparently TraceMonkey is ~1.2x slower than Crankshaft on your machine. Things are hotting up indeed!
- sarjoor 16y agoChrome with Crankshaft (which is currently only for 32-bit architecture) is faster on Kraken than Firefox nightly. http://www.arewefastyet.com/awfy2.php?machine=9 http://www.arewefastyet.com/awfy2.php?machine=9