4 ms·
Moving to current cities may still be what's causing life expectancy to increase, even if moving to cities in the past didn't. Cities weren't held constant.
by icebraining 8y ago
Moving to current cities may still be what's causing life expectancy to increase, even if moving to cities in the past didn't. Cities weren't held constant.
- DuskStar 8y agoOf course! But I'd still guess that it's not some intrinsic property of cities, and that a large part of the difference would be explained by income differentials (or job differences - no chance of getting crushed by a tractor in Times Square).
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- icebraining 8y agoIf job differences are not intrinsic to cities, what is?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- DuskStar 8y agoDensity, maybe?
- icebraining 8y agoYeah, and I'd say those differences in density inevitably cause differences in types of jobs. It's second order, but still intrinsic.