3 ms·
>But there is no constitutional right to harass others or live-stream violence. Pretty sure the Supreme Court would disagree with you on that one, bud. They a
by drngdds 7y ago
>But there is no constitutional right to harass others or live-stream violence.
Pretty sure the Supreme Court would disagree with you on that one, bud. They aren't fond of adding new categories of unprotected speech. See Trope #3 in this article: https://www.popehat.com/2015/05/19/how-to-spot-and-critique-censorship-tropes-in-the-medias-coverage-of-free-speech-controversies/ https://www.popehat.com/2015/05/19/how-to-spot-and-critique-...
- davemp 7y agoThe trope "But there is no constitutional right to [blah]" is blatantly ignoring the 9th amendment. [1] [1]: https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-9 https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-9