We'll put. The big social media players underappreciate the areas that they've found themselves in, a major part of news media. Dealing with fake news, intell

We'll put. The big social media players underappreciate the areas that they've found themselves in, a major part of news media. Dealing with fake news, intelligence backed propoganda, and censorship of certain content are very difficult tasks. They aren't just "security" or "platform abuse" issues. These are editorial & fact checking issues. Ultimately, it will be impossible to deal with them via clear policies and software. The only way to do it is with human intelligence, decision making and judgement. A video of an isis execution could be snuff, critical news, isis propoganda, baathist propoganda... The types of organisations that do these kinds ds of jobs tend to have it baked into their DNA. Journalistic organizations for examlr, that have editorial philosophies embedded in their DNA the way Facebook has software development embedded into it's. In terms of online media, Wikipedia is the best example, imo. Dealing with this stuff is at it's core. I can't see FB ever becoming adequately capable of dealing with these types of issues. Even bans get I to tricky territory once you reach FB/twitter scale.