3 ms·
> If Rust is the answer, why are you pushing for new langs when Rust is sufficient? Something doesn't add up here. Maybe because he said, twice, that Rust is n
by ascar 7y ago
> If Rust is the answer, why are you pushing for new langs when Rust is sufficient? Something doesn't add up here.
Maybe because he said, twice, that Rust is not all the way there?
- tempguy9999 7y agoYou're quite right, thank you, upvoted. However if he says "Rust gets us 80% of the way there" as you point out then he is obliged, IMO, to point out explicitly the 20% where it fails or we can't even begin to discuss it.
- DevoidSimo 7y agoHe mentions Rc and Arc which I assume is what he means by the 20%. I tend to agree, although I'm not sure how you would get rid of them.