4 ms·
Keep in mind that military is a tool of the last resort for the tyranny when dealing with its own population. One typical scenario in the suppression of the fr
by wanderer2323 7y ago
Keep in mind that military is a tool of the last resort for the tyranny when dealing with its own population.
One typical scenario in the suppression of the free speech is the (illegally) armed brownshirts breaking down the door of the family house where the wrongthink assembly is taking place and lynching the people inside. The police shows up in the morning and -- wow, another one of the unsolvable crimes by the unknown perpertrators with the unknowable motives. Add guns and suddenly this is impossible. Storming a firearm-defended position is not something a brownshirt mob is able to do.
The second scenario is the police overreach. The shocktroopers in blue show up at the ghetto and load up the whole households of 'undesirables' into the black cars to never be seen again. Again, this all falls apart if the population is armed. Once it is clear to the masses that the purge is going to take place, the ghetto becomes a killing field because every window is a gun port and the stopped cars are the perfect targets.
The point of the armed populace in 21st century is not to win the war with the tyrant's standing army. It's to make sure that the tyrant cannot disappear the large swathes of population without taking casualties and without making what's going on obvious to the public.
- amanaplanacanal 7y agoScenario one seems possible. I dunno. Maybe. Scenario two doesn't work that way. They firebomb the offending houses. We've seen it before. Multiple times.
- wanderer2323 7y agoNo idea what events you are referring to by 'multiple times'. For scenario 2 I mostly think of Warsaw Ghetto Uprising where they did eventually burn it completely -- but it took a large amount of resourses, a considerable time -- and most importantly it created a point of resistance making it impossible to pretend that nothing atrocious was happening.
- CamperBob2 7y agoProbably they're referring to the MOVE bombing [1], a case where the police carried out a literal air strike on civilians. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Africa https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Africa Of course, that's not the best example to cite when trying to argue that the police, government, and military should have a monopoly on the tools of violence.