> I vaguely recall stories about Lisp machine users who would turn off GC while working That was more in the early days when the GC was more primitive. The la

> I vaguely recall stories about Lisp machine users who would turn off GC while working That was more in the early days when the GC was more primitive. The later GC was actually several different ones. A huge impact had the so-called 'Ephemeral GC', where the machine tracks changed RAM memory (it uses virtual memory in general) and where the EGC focuses on those areas with objects which were only very short-lived. That means, given a sufficient amount of memory, the machine stayed fast and responsive for a long time. The main problem was the low amount of RAM (20MB were common after the mid 80s), because RAM was very expensive, and the large amount of virtual memory (possibly hundreds of MB on slow disks). Thus what made the machines really slow was the GC over virtual memory with relatively slow disks. Thus the later mainly used GC was incremental&generational&copying&with areas and with support from the EGC - a full Mark&Sweep GC would keep the machine possibly busy for 15-40 minutes.