That's a lot of words and generalizations, but doesn't seem to explain why a corporation that chooses to aid in an unlawful attack should be pitied when they fa

That's a lot of words and generalizations, but doesn't seem to explain why a corporation that chooses to aid in an unlawful attack should be pitied when they fall prey to an unlawful attack in retribution. You seem to be of the opinion that suddenly suspending the account of an organization that hasn't broken the law is a neutral, harmless action.