3 ms·
My apologies if that came off as criticism when it was intended to be violent agreement.
by mattrp 7y ago
My apologies if that came off as criticism when it was intended to be violent agreement.
- simonebrunozzi 7y agoNo need to apologize! Also, careful with guaranteed - AWS has his special wording about SLAs and guarantees, e.g. S3 "designed" for 11 9s of durability, which sounds like a guarantee but it isn't.
- _msw_ 7y agoDisclosure: I work at AWS Some organizations set high SLAs and play the odds that they will meet them, figuring that it's worth it in marketing dollars if they have to pay out. For an AWS SLA like Route53's 100% Availability [1], the service is fundamentally engineered in a way that the SLA will be met. The S3 SLA can be found at [2] [1] https://aws.amazon.com/route53/sla/ https://aws.amazon.com/route53/sla/ [2] https://aws.amazon.com/s3/sla/ https://aws.amazon.com/s3/sla/
- adreamingsoul 7y ago"the service is fundamentally engineered in a way that the SLA will be met" So... with the recent Route53 outage, do you still believe that statement to be true?