4 ms·
It's a stretch, but maybe they're talking about anonymous vs non-anymous donors? That's the biggest thing in the ethics section of the Wikipedia page. https://
by swirepe 7y ago
It's a stretch, but maybe they're talking about anonymous vs non-anymous donors? That's the biggest thing in the ethics section of the Wikipedia page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sperm_donation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sperm_donation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fertility_tourism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fertility_tourism
- lurquer 7y agoLet's take a step back for a second... whether one agrees or not, it is obvious and not fairly deniable that this type of reproduction was illegal in most countries until just a few decades ago. Many major religions condemn the practice. (Until relatively recently, ALL branches of Christianity condemned it.) It would be worth mentioning the underlying reasons for these views in such an article. Allow me to be blunt (at the risk of getting downvoted): Does jerking off and selling your cum to strange women raise ethical issues? I think the question answers itself.
- swirepe 7y ago> Does jerking off and selling your cum to strange women raise ethical issues? I agree, cum should be free. Eggs I can see paying for because the supply is limited, but things like blood or semen should be free.