4 ms·
I don't think there's a crime called "impregnating a woman without consent". Not only that, he also had consent to impregnate her. The question is about where t
by Mirioron 8y ago
I don't think there's a crime called "impregnating a woman without consent". Not only that, he also had consent to impregnate her. The question is about where the sperm came from, but I think it's rather unclear that this would be any kind of legal violation.
- toomuchtodo 8y agoHow is using sperm a patient didn’t consent to not assault?
- mises 8y agoI agree it's wrong, but assault usual implies a physical attack (or, more specifically, the threat thereof). I'm not sure this qualifies; it may be a situation where laws need tweaking to keep up with the times. Certainly malpractice, though.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- toomuchtodo 8y agoThe definition of sexual assault is not limited to physical battery alone.
- anbop 8y agoIt’s a physical attack, it’s literally inserting a baby into someone under conditions that were not consented to.
- thatoneuser 8y agoRepeating that's it's assault doesn't just make it assault. How do you know what the conditions anyone signed were? Just gleaming an opinion from a headline?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]