Reading that article, the confusion is easy to explain and looks intentional. It reads "For certain sensitive information, Apple uses end-to-end encryption. Th

Reading that article, the confusion is easy to explain and looks intentional. It reads "For certain sensitive information, Apple uses end-to-end encryption. This means that only you can access your information" and then immediate shows a giant table of data that is NOT end-to-end encrypted, but not labelled as such -- it's only inferrable by its omissions from the next section of the document.