4 ms·
Why are you condescending me? I studied applications of GAN nets for dozens of hours (still an amateur beginner of course). I didn't even know it was such a buz
by TomMarius 7y ago
Why are you condescending me? I studied applications of GAN nets for dozens of hours (still an amateur beginner of course). I didn't even know it was such a buzzword when I got started as I don't follow twitter etc.
Here is a paper that talks about exactly what I am proposing, using GANs, minus evolved antennas: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.01875 https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.01875 (it is no secret that this paper has inspired me to write this question - my thoughts were about improving it with evolved antennas).
About the clean data requirement, it is common practice to record as much as possible once doctors open somebody's skull because such opportunity is scarce. So people are working on it.
- p1esk 7y agoI apologize, for some reason I was in confrontational mood. This paper is also about using GANs to generate fake data. Here’s the thing - to generate high quality fake data you need to have a lot of real data, but if you do then you don’t really need fake data. Re denoising with GANs: do you have a lot of clean data (eg from inside the skull) that is equivalent to the noisy data (from outside the skull)? Let’s assume you do. Do you have any example of someone using GANs to clean those signals? Or any radio signals? What makes you think it would work better than any other existing denoising methods?