2 ms·
Apologies for poorly wording things. My point wasn't on the feature, but the culture that allowed the feature to be created. That's why I started by saying the
by holy_city 7y ago
Apologies for poorly wording things. My point wasn't on the feature, but the culture that allowed the feature to be created.
That's why I started by saying the disregard for privacy troubles me, and provided an example of a feature that was created out of that disregard, in my opinion.
Maybe I shouldn't have said it's absurd that they would find people liking the feature, but that it's absurd they consider it ethical to scrape private financial information and then present it as a nifty notification, and even more absurd that users don't see an issue with it.
- TulliusCicero 7y agoEven many people who are aware of what's going on, who are having the thing done to them, are fine with it, which is a pretty good argument against, "I can't believe anyone would think this is ethical". Apparently a large portion of the target demographic thinks it is, indeed, ethical. > even more absurd that users don't see an issue with it I don't see it as absurd, for the same reasons I've elaborated on elsewhere in the thread: the benefits are concrete and current, while the harms are nebulous/potential/abstract.