5 ms·
Jeff - are the disks slower (but bigger) than the i3 versions? It looks like the IOPS and throughput are lower at the top end (looking at the two release pages
by dhendo 7y ago
Jeff - are the disks slower (but bigger) than the i3 versions?
It looks like the IOPS and throughput are lower at the top end (looking at the two release pages).
- p0rkbelly 7y agoYou see something greater than 2-million IOPS?
- dhendo 7y agoYes - the announcement for the older i3 instances (https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/now-available-i3-instances-for-demanding-io-intensive-applications/ https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/now-available-i3-instances-...) claims 3.3M IOPS (presumably on the largest size, with 15.2TB) So it looks to me like these are larger, slower drives?
- wmf 7y agoIt used to be 3.3M IOPS on 8 SSDs and now it's 2M on 8 SSDs but significantly cheaper; I wouldn't be surprised if they've replaced MLC with TLC.
- Rafuino 7y ago8 TLC drives could easily hit 3.3M IOPS before... i3 have 8 1.9TB NVMe SSDs max, right? A 2TB P4600(TLC NAND) has 610,000 random read IOPS max, so that's 4.8M IOPS right there. A 7.68TB P4320 has 427,000 random read IOPS max, so that's 3.42M IOPS right there over 8 drives... Maybe they went from TLC to QLC with these ones?
- lfittl 7y agoThis seems to be confirmed by the IOPS numbers in the documentation: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/storage-optimized-instances.html#i2-instances-diskperf https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/storage-...
- jeffbarr 7y agoI am supposedly on a stay-cation this week. I'll ask the team to check this thread.
- brian_herman__ 7y agoEnjoy your time off!