3 ms·

Related: https://ianlunn.github.io/Hover/ https://ianlunn.github.io/Hover/

• spzb 7y ago
  I think that dev needs to revisit his licensing. He's used an MIT license and then added some exclusions which sound a lot more like GPL.
  • lixtra 7y ago
    Yes, see https://github.com/IanLunn/Hover/issues/123 https://github.com/IanLunn/Hover/issues/123. Last pure MIT version: https://github.com/IanLunn/Hover/commit/7b2597e011c3495511f93cbca4e148308e0df1c7 https://github.com/IanLunn/Hover/commit/7b2597e011c3495511f9...
  • dvcrn 7y ago
    Yeah I'm also a little confused about the license. The website state it's MIT for personal use but not MIT for commercial. Given the MIT license for personal, couldn't I just fork it under MIT and re-license my fork for commercial under MIT as well? (I'm a license noob)
  • Hamuko 7y ago
    I wonder if those exclusions are even valid, because clicking on the "Read full license" gives a license which includes none of those exclusions. Surely the full license should have those exclusions specified.