5 ms·
People complain so much about the USA immigration law, however the USA remains to be one of the only countries where you can own property if you are not a natur
by deytempo 7y ago
People complain so much about the USA immigration law, however the USA remains to be one of the only countries where you can own property if you are not a natural born citizen. There are those who think the latter should change to protect its natural born citizens. Is it a simpler matter to immigrate to India?
- barry-cotter 7y agoIf you have a well paying job getting a work visa is by all accounts not difficult. If you’re legally resident for twelve years you can naturalise, or seven years if you’re married to an Indian citizen. Most developed countries will let anyone with the requisite funds buy property, with no particular restrictions on foreigners. It’s certainly the case in the EU, Japan, the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
- deytempo 7y agoI am not talking about most “developed” countries. I am taking about most countries.
- gdfasfklshg4 7y ago> USA remains to be one of the only countries where you can own property if you are not a natural born citizen. This is just not true.
- deytempo 7y agoYou are implying that it isn’t one of the only countries where this is the case?
- gdfasfklshg4 7y agoYes.
- deytempo 7y agoThen you are wrong
- _jgdh 7y ago> one of the only countries I live in Europe. I wonder what my Chinese landlords (who've lived their whole lives in China) would say if they read your comment.
- deytempo 7y agoSo are there more countries that let foreigners own land or more that do not?
- mikeash 7y agoWhere do people get crazy ideas like this?
- catach 7y agoA system can have both good and bad parts. The good parts cannot protect the system from criticism about the bad parts.