That's $776M for the quarter, not for the year. Typically, when doing the "multiples of revenue" valuation comparison, that's done on yearly numbers, not quarte

That's $776M for the quarter, not for the year. Typically, when doing the "multiples of revenue" valuation comparison, that's done on yearly numbers, not quarterly numbers. I have no idea how constant their revenue figures are quarter-by-quarter, so won't even guess about what a yearly revenue figure might look like. But "$17B on 776M" isn't doing the comparison the way I typically see it.