4 ms·
Look at the program: fn find_replaced_sequence_length(sequence: String) -> usize { // Replace the following patterns, one at a time: let substs = vec
by v_lisivka 7y ago
Look at the program:
fn find_replaced_sequence_length(sequence: String) -> usize {
// Replace the following patterns, one at a time:
let substs = vec![
("tHa[Nt]", "<4>"),
("aND|caN|Ha[DS]|WaS", "<3>"),
("a[NSt]|BY", "<2>"),
("<[^>]*>", "|"),
("\\|[^|][^|]*\\|", "-"),
];
// Perform the replacements in the sequence:
substs
.iter()
.fold(sequence, |s, (re, replacement)| {
regex(re)
.replace_all(&s, NoExpand(replacement)).into_owned()
}).len()
}
It measures performance of RE engine. I can switch from regex crate to PCRE2, and program performance will match C.
- igouy 7y ago> I can switch from regex crate to PCRE2, and program performance will match C. Perhaps it would; those measurements have not been made. What does that have to do with re-writing libraries to make tiny toy programs run better? What does that have to do with program performance being a proxy for programmer effort?