3 ms·
In Estonian e-voting they allowed to change the vote later or re-vote offline. So that if someone sold their vote or was forced to vote, they can later change t
by codedokode 7y ago
In Estonian e-voting they allowed to change the vote later or re-vote offline. So that if someone sold their vote or was forced to vote, they can later change their mind.
But such scheme is still vulnerable: for example, imagine if a large state-owned or having close ties with government company forces their employees to vote online under supervision. If the employees are not very good with computers or don't own one, they cannot change their vote online later, and employer can set their shifts to a voting day so that they cannot visit the polling station.
- mehrdadn 7y agoIsn't there a much more practical vulnerability? Just forcing people to vote in front of you in the last 15 minutes or something?
- ddebernardy 7y agoIt's not just that. Some UK researchers also demonstrated how it was possible to confuse voters whose devices were infected by malware. The trick basically was to display X to the voter and send Y instead.