You are not categorically wrong because I missed some semantics in my statements. However the essence of what your saying is incorrect. Let me rephrase more sp

You are not categorically wrong because I missed some semantics in my statements. However the essence of what your saying is incorrect. Let me rephrase more specifically: CSS3 + HTML5 is turing complete. Since CSS is always used in the context of HTML I left that out, but rigor is important! source: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2497146/is-css-turing-complete https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2497146/is-css-turing-co... Note that this happened with the later versions of CSS indicating that the specification became turing complete after years and years of tacking on features. This is the pattern of bloat accumulating over time.