This is a very good point, and one that I hadn't considered. From TFA: > When asked for more clarity on which policies Dissenter did not comply with, Mozilla s

This is a very good point, and one that I hadn't considered. From TFA: > When asked for more clarity on which policies Dissenter did not comply with, Mozilla said that they received abuse reports for this extension. It further added that the platform is being used for promoting violence, hate speech, and discrimination, but they failed to show any examples to add any credibility to their claims. If that's the case, who's to say that Firefox itself hasn't been used for these purposes?