4 ms·
lsd: run1: 0.03user 0.04system 0:00.16elapsed 50%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4884maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+4635minor)pagefaults 0swaps
by apjana 7y ago
lsd:
run1:
0.03user 0.04system 0:00.16elapsed 50%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4884maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+4635minor)pagefaults 0swaps
run2:
0.02user 0.05system 0:00.10elapsed 77%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4920maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+4635minor)pagefaults 0swaps
run3:
0.03user 0.04system 0:00.14elapsed 58%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4936maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+4635minor)pagefaults 0swaps
- eridius 7y agoI went ahead and ran the tests myself, using hyperfine. In fact, I reproduced the benchmark described on the lsd README directly, except using `ls -FG` instead of colorls. Benchmark #1: lsd -la /etc/* Time (mean ± σ): 34.2 ms ± 0.9 ms [User: 18.7 ms, System: 13.0 ms] Range (min … max): 32.9 ms … 37.6 ms Benchmark #2: ls -FG /etc/* Time (mean ± σ): 7.1 ms ± 0.3 ms [User: 3.2 ms, System: 3.4 ms] Range (min … max): 6.4 ms … 8.9 ms Benchmark #3: exa -la /etc/* Time (mean ± σ): 24.7 ms ± 1.2 ms [User: 19.3 ms, System: 25.4 ms] Range (min … max): 23.3 ms … 33.3 ms