Looking at voting statitics here in Sweden, the pattern is very similar to lobbying. A party that cater to one demographic gets votes for doing that, while loos

Looking at voting statitics here in Sweden, the pattern is very similar to lobbying. A party that cater to one demographic gets votes for doing that, while loosing votes to demographics that the competition caters to. To me this shows the opposite of uninformed. The information about which political party is catering to which demographic is distributed well and effective. It becomes even more clear when two parties uses the others opposite demographic as "the other" for which all problems in society can be attributed to. When you are declared the enemy by one side and the targeted beneficiary by the other it is very easy for votes to align themselves accordingly. I don't blame them for that.