2 ms·
I don't know anything about mechanical shock waves due to rapid heating in the material but in terms of the weight of an additional heat shields and their effec
by wnkrshm 7y ago
I don't know anything about mechanical shock waves due to rapid heating in the material but in terms of the weight of an additional heat shields and their effectiveness I've found this:
AVCOAT 5026-39 which apparently is an ablative heat-shield material for NASA's Orion (and has been developed during the Apollo years) has a density of 0.51g/cm³ so about half the density of water and one fifth that of aluminum (of which a guided missile is made mostly, I believe).
From reading some reports of the performance of Apollo era heat shields it's clear though that reentry is a way more gentle affair in terms of thermal load, than a 50kW laser in a 1cm2 spot.
The endured peak heat flux per area is about 0,48 kW/cm2 for the heat shield, magnitudes off, if the 50kW laser can achieve a 1cm2 spot.
The total amount of heat flux the ablator was required to endure results in a total amount of heat energy/area of 0,0141 kWh/cm2 - which 50kW in a 1cm2 spot would saturate in about 1 second. Reentry lasted 800-1000 seconds.