3 ms·
I find myself nodding along with everything you've said, except for this: > I'm a little disappointed at how bare-bones dependency management and control is.
by majewsky 8y ago
I find myself nodding along with everything you've said, except for this:
> I'm a little disappointed at how bare-bones dependency management and control is.
Is that referring to Go modules, or to the situation before it? I just started using Go modules in my active projects, and I find that it matches your overall characterization of Go: reasonably practical, a little boring.
- ufmace 8y agoThat refers to the situation before it, I suppose, since I'm not sure what Go modules are. I haven't messed with Go much in a few months though. If it lets you specify somewhere which packages/modules your Go project uses and what versions are okay, and upgrade packages within the permitted version range without disrupting other Go projects you're working on, then it might be just what the language needed.
- majewsky 8y agoYes, it's pretty much that.