3 ms·

It's hard to think of a plausible way that Rosa Parks hurt anyone but it's very easy to think of plausible ways that having your credit card denied could hurt y

It's hard to think of a plausible way that Rosa Parks hurt anyone but it's very easy to think of plausible ways that having your credit card denied could hurt you. But I didn't know it was online only. In that case it's hard to think of plausible ways it would do physical harm. I didn't say "violent" so don't complain about me calling stuff "violent". All I said is that economic harm can cause physical harm, it's not harmless (contrary to the person who said it is harmless. not low on harm but literally harmless). You should not be upset with people who make corrections without expressing any opinion. Factual, literal-minded minor corrections are no threat to your side unless your side is mistaken.

jasonlotito 16y ago
> It's hard to think of a plausible way that Rosa Parks hurt anyone but it's very easy to think of plausible ways that having your credit card denied could hurt you. No. I can't think of a way having my CC being denied online is going to physically hurt me. Maybe you can give an example. Seriously though, your logic is flawed. > I didn't say "violent" so don't complain about me calling stuff "violent". Sorry, but what would you call an attack that causes physical harm? Peaceful? You don't have to say the word violent, but you can still describe it. > All I said is that economic harm can cause physical harm And a butterflies wing could flap because of it can cause a hurricane causing the deaths of millions. Yes, everything is connected. I can create all sorts of crazy scenarios. Let's stick to reality. Anon is doing a DDoS. Twisting that round and saying "Anon is attacking people causing physical harm" is dumb. > Factual, literal-minded minor corrections are no threat to your side unless your side is mistaken. I'm fine with factual, logical minded corrections. Your comment was void of that. You should remember context. Until you can show anon attacking people causing physical harm, your actually not saying anything.
- xenophanes 16y ago
  Why so hateful?

jasonlotito 16y ago

> It's hard to think of a plausible way that Rosa Parks hurt anyone but it's very easy to think of plausible ways that having your credit card denied could hurt you. No. I can't think of a way having my CC being denied online is going to physically hurt me. Maybe you can give an example. Seriously though, your logic is flawed. > I didn't say "violent" so don't complain about me calling stuff "violent". Sorry, but what would you call an attack that causes physical harm? Peaceful? You don't have to say the word violent, but you can still describe it. > All I said is that economic harm can cause physical harm And a butterflies wing could flap because of it can cause a hurricane causing the deaths of millions. Yes, everything is connected. I can create all sorts of crazy scenarios. Let's stick to reality. Anon is doing a DDoS. Twisting that round and saying "Anon is attacking people causing physical harm" is dumb. > Factual, literal-minded minor corrections are no threat to your side unless your side is mistaken. I'm fine with factual, logical minded corrections. Your comment was void of that. You should remember context. Until you can show anon attacking people causing physical harm, your actually not saying anything.

xenophanes 16y ago
Why so hateful?